|
Determination of
Altitudes
and Notes on the
Barometrical Observations
taken on the Carson and Johnson Immigrant Roads
over the Sierra Nevada in 1855
by George H. Goddard, Civil Engineer
The
origin of the survey
(Note: The instruments shown are only
similar to the unstruments used by Goddard and
Day.)
The
altitudes given in the following tables have been calculated
from a series of observations made with the aneroid
barometer during the journey. These observations are given
in full. The
aneroid barometer used was No. 264 J. W. Queen, Chestnut
Street, Philadelphia.
Note: In the
1850s, Queen's aneroids were actually supplied by W. &
L. E. Gurley in New York, who probably imported them from
Vidie in Paris or Dent in London. Te view here also shows
the mechanism of an example marked Queen and dating to the
period.
It will be seen by a comparison with the Register kept by
Dr. Logan of Sacramento which follows that the aneroid was
two tenths of an inch lower than the Doctor's barometer on
the 1st August. There is reason to believe that the latter
even was too low, but in the absence of a standard
barometer, it is impossible to tell what the true height of
the mercury should be in this country at the sea level.
Certain it is that the barometer in general use here, mostly
of English construction [Ship Barometers] stand
very low, while those which have been prepared with
care, and set up in San Francisco, on the contrary, appear
to stand too high. It is possible that the
quicksilver may be impure in the latter and its specific
gravity in consequence too little. We await with impatience,
the arrival of a Standard Barometer which is now on its way
to the country sent by the Smithsonian Institution to the
San Francisco Academy of Natural Science.
In reducing the observations, into altitude, I have
considered it more advisable to depend rather upon the
results obtained by successive difference from station to
station, taken within a few hours of each other under nearly
similar atmospheric circumstances, than upon those obtained
by any other mode. Thus, instead of taking the mean of all
the observations at any camp as the reading of the upper
station and the present uncertain base of our sea level as
the lower reading. I have in all cases preferred taking the
differences between the last observation on leaving Camp and
the first observation made on the road and so on, the
difference between each observation and its last preceding
one, until our arrival at the evening Camp when the first
observation is the one used. The successive differences thus
obtained being put together give the heights furnished in
the table. Although this method carries an error once
committed throughout the entire series, still I conceive it
gives a nearer approximation to the truth than a mean
derived from the [word?] observation made at any
camp and compared with what I consider as an altogether
imaginary base, could possib[ly] give.
 In
addition to the aneroid, I was furnished with one of Green's
Iron Cistern Mountain Barometers*, but from the difficulties
attendant upon setting up this instrument. it could only be
used at the principle Camps by way of a test on the aneroid.
Unfortunately, I did not receive it in time to set it up in
Sacramento, so as to compare it with the aneroid before
leaving on out journey. This comparison was, however, made
at Placerville and at the Astronomical Station in Clear Lake
Valley [now Caples Lake Reservoir], the highest
permanent camp on the journey, and in both instances the two
instruments coincided, as will be seen by the Register. At
this Camp, the Mountain Barometer was unfortunately broken,
and so no further comparison could be instituted. The
fluctuations of the Aneroid are more considerable than those
of the Mercurial Barometer--particularly those caused by the
non-periodic variation of atmospheric pressure.
*James Green of Baltimore, and later
New York, was one of the foremost makers of barometers in
America. "Green's iron cistern mountain
barometer" was of a type which
he had made for J. H. Alexander. It was an improvement on
one designed by Ferdinand
Rudolf Hassler of the U. S.
Coast and Geodetic Survey--one of Frémont's
mentors. Ten years earlier, Frémont was much
better
equipped.
In 1856 Green designed an improved
portable barometer based on Fortin's design which was
used in surveys and by stations of the US Weather Bureau
for many years. It was a Green's mountain barometer that
was used by Robert Stockton Williamson on his survey
published as On the Use of the Barometer on Surveys
and Reconnaissances , D. Van Nostrand, New York,
1868.
Williamson recommended against the use
of the aneroid:
"The aneroid is a very convenient
little instrument. But for nice work, as hypsometrical
work, as at present constructed, an inferior
instrument."
On page 131 of the above work he
published a table of comparisons of an un-named aneroid
with Greens Cistern barometer No. 1343.
The correction of the Horary Variation and extreme air
temperature given in the very valuable Barometrical reports
of L. Blodget of the Smithsonian Institution and Dr. George
Engleman of St. Louis, and used in the reduction of the
observation made on the exploration of Lt. Whipple and
Beckwith, and which appear to be required for the California
Climate, however applicable they may be to the mercurial
Barometer do not appear to answer for the Aneroid. There is
indeed an uncertainty as to the amount of correction the
aneroid requires for difference of temperature, and indeed
as to what formula is most applicable to the reduction of
[the] observation made with this instrument. After
trying several, I found the well known formula of Baily For.
38 Astro Table to give the best result, and therefore have
used it in all cases.
There is another source of uncertainty with the
aneroid--it appears to be highly sensitive to wind, and the
amount of correction required can only be considered as
approximately known. Hourly observations should be taken
with these instruments at the principle points to get data
for future use: my time, however too much occupied with the
other duties of the Survey to allow me to give that
attention I would have wished to give to this subject.
Yet notwithstanding all these uncertainties, and sources
of error, I have had several most surprising instances of
the correct working of the Aneroid used. It is with
considerable satisfaction and pleasure that I give the
following comparisons with actual measurements since made by
the Hon. Sherman Day over the same ground in the Survey of
the Immigrant Wagon Road.
In my preliminary report dated Oct 5 and published on the
following day, I give the approximate height of Cary's Mill
in Carson Valley [Woodfords] and the head of the
Carson Canyon in Hope Valley. The difference of elevation
between these two points was 1456.2 ft. Mr. Day on his
return in the last week of December gave me his measurement
with theodolite and chain up the Carson Canyon between the
same points, which amount to 1455.4 ft, thus proving the
wonderful and absolute accuracy of the instrument in the
observation.
In
the height of Luther's Pass above the same point in Hope
Valley, the difference will be seen to be 695.5 ft by my
observation. Mr. Day's measurement makes it 715.6 ft. There
is an apparent error here of 20 ft, but the height given by
me was at the lowest point of the Divide where the road
crosses a small ridge slightly elevated above the former
which makes the observation almost if not quite identical.
In the height of the Slippery Ford Hill, we correspond again
exactly. In some points, however, there are discrepancies.
Mr. Day makes the descent from Marlett's Flat [Grass
Lake] to Biggler Lake [now Lake Tahoe-Goddard's
drawing at right] Valley 40 feet greater than I do. In
the height also of the Johnson's Pass Mr. Day's height will
I expect also exceed mine by about 100 feet. There is,
however, a little uncertainty as our points of observation
were not the same. I took the lowest point on the road of
the summit of the divide, as the top of the pass while the
old road [Johnson's] winds along on the divide for a
quarter of a mile at an increased elevation.
I may also mention that in the same preliminary report
the difference between the elevation of the Mormon Station
[Genoa] and of Cary's Mill [Woodfords] is
within five feet of that made by reckoning it from the
successive differences along the road.
So many instances of accuracy absolute and approximate
gives me a great reliance in the Aneroid Barometer when used
with care, but at the same time it is an instrument so
liable to change its zero from a jar or a blow, that it
ought be carried in a basket by hand, by a person on foot,
and not strapped across the shoulder or carried by a
horseman. There being no means of detecting the amount of
error caused by a change o zero, it is impossible to be too
careful in its use. It is an instrument so adapted to an
exploration of this nature, from the ease and rapidity with
which an observation can be made, that it is certainly
deserving of that care and attention that shall insure
accuracy in its results.
The
means of testing it at all the principle Camps should
likewise be provided, so as to obtain data for its
temperature and horary corrections as well as to be able to
reset it., should its zero have been altered. The mercurial
barometer should be used for this purpose, as the errors to
which the measurement of height by the boiling point
[see hypsometer at right] is subject are so very
serious, that little dependence can be placed on the results
so obtained.
Note: This was the method resorted to of
necessity by Frémont in this region in 1844
On my return to Placerville I handed over the Aneroid to
Mr. Day, who has had it with him ever since testing it on
several occasions. It has, however had its zero altered by
rough usage several times. Still Mr. Day states that the
difference between certain points on the road are very
similar to those given by me.
For more readily formed conception of the relative level
of the country arranger at table of the altitudes of all the
principle points on the old Carson and the Johnson Roads in
the order of elevation.
I have also inserted amongst these tables one of the
heights along the Sonora and Walker River Immigrant Road
made from a series of observations taken with the Aneroid
barometer by me when acting as Civil Engineer to the
Railroad expedition made under Lieut. Moore in Oct 1853.
The observations were tested by the boiling point
at all the Camps, which invariably gave a yet greater
elevation; I am under the impression however that the
heights given in the table are too great for all the points
on the eastern slope of the mountains, high winds having
lowered the instrument on several occasions. The mode of
reduction I have employed was that of the means of
the observations against the monthly mean of Dr. Gibbons'
Barometer at San Francisco as a base. As previously stated,
this method of reduction I have since abandoned, for that of
successive differences, which if applied to heights on the
road in question would lower them from 100 up perhaps to 400
or 500 ft in the more eastern portions of the journey.
George H. Goddard
An examination of the
some of Altitudes Determined
|
Location
|
"hg
recorded
|
The determined
elevation 1855
|
Actual
elevation
|
Reduced by modern
formula* 
|
|
Bartlett's Bridge
S. Fk. American River below
Pacific House
|
26.77"hg
|
2532'
|
3140'
|
3039'
|
|
Top of Slippery Ford Grade
Camp Sacramento
|
23.96"hg
|
5358'
|
6068'
|
6714'
|
|
Luther Pass
|
22.53"hg
|
7185'
|
7735'
|
7749'
|
|
Carson Pass
|
21.88"hg
|
7972'
|
8600'
|
8549'
|
|
Clear Lake
Now Caples Lake
Reservoir
|
22.48"hg
|
7179'
|
7760'
|
7810'
|
|
Hope Valley
Top of Carson Canyon
|
23.12"hg
|
6535'
7070'was the
evation determined by R. L. Williamson about
1860
|
7056'
|
7043'
|
|
Johnson Pass
|
22.84"hg
|
6,752'
|
7,377'
|
7,376'
|
|
Strawberry
|
24.12"hg
|
5,136'
|
5,900'
|
5,886'
|
|
Wrights Lake Road at Highway 50
|
24.50"hg
|
4,901'
|
5,427'
|
5,459'
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Z= 62900
log10 Po/P using sea
level mean for month.
|
This was real pioneering use of the aneroid in survey work.
Although the elevations determined by Goddard and Day are in
all cases much to low, their confidence in the accuracy and
practicality of their aneroid barometer appears to have been
entirely warranted. It was the formulas used for reducing
their observations that were not up to the task. Using a
modern formula their original observations from their
instrument yields excellent results.
Further examination of Goddard's data in the
Eldorado
National Forest Johnson's Road Project.
But six years later, in September, 1861, William
H. Brewer, Chief Assistant of the Whitney survey
reported the following on an ascent of Mt.
Diablo.
"We carried to the top a new barometer, one
made for the government topographical engineers, and an
aneroid barometer of the finest construction, to test the
accuracy of the other instrument. We found it far less
accurate than the mercurial barometer, and it required as
much care to carry it."
|