Frémont,
January 14, 1844. We encamped on the shore,
opposite a very remarkable rock in the lake, which had
attracted our attention for many miles. It rose,
according to our estimate, 600 feet above the water, and,
from the point we viewed it, presented a pretty exact
outline of the great pyramid of Cheops. Like other rocks
along the shore, it seemed to be incrusted with
calcareous cement. This striking feature suggested a name
for the lake, and I called it Pyramid Lake.
This
is a recent photograph compared to the drawing made by
Charles Preuss of the encampment on the east shore of
Pyramid Lake on January 12, 1844. Note that the lake level
is lower today, and that the rock shown in the lake in 1844
is today high and dry on the shore. The level change is, in
part, cyclical, but is mostly because of diversion of the
Truckee River (Frémont's "Salmon Trout River") for
agricultural purposes and for the supply of water to the
city of Reno.
But
also note Preuss's carefully drawn details. There is a
problem trying to match perspectives photographically.
Preuss has drawn the mountains in the background accurately,
but it would take a telephoto lens to reproduce his
perspective. However, that would compress the foreground.
This is always a problem in trying to use a camera to
reproduce what the eye sees. Because of the distances
involved, it would require merging two photographs
(foreground and background), taken with lenses of different
focal lengths, to duplicate what the artist saw and
drew.
Here another view of the location above. The map insert
shows the coordinates based on the Preuss drawing.
Frémont made no determination of his position.
Another
example of this problem of photographically reproducing the
perspective of an artist is in Preuss's view of Island
Lake in the Wind River Chain of the Rock Mountains in
1842.
And
winter Long Camp near Carson pass.
Frémont: The water is so
slightly salt, that, at first, we thought it fresh, and
would be pleasant to drink when no other could be had.
The shore was rocky--a handsome beach, which reminded us
of the sea. On some large granite boulders that were
scattered about the shore, I remarked a coating of
calcareous substance, in some places a few inches, and in
others a foot in thickness. Near our camp, the hills,
which were of primitive rock, were also covered with this
substance, which was in too great quantity on the
mountains along the shore of the lake to have been
deposited by water, and has the appearance of having been
spread over the rocks in mass.
The label attached to a specimen of this rock was
lost; but I append an analysis of that which, from
memory, I judge to be the specimen:
Carbonate of lime, 77.31
Carbonate of magnesia, 5.25
Oxide of iron, 1.60
Alumina, 1.05
Silica, 8.55
Organic matter, water, and loss, 6.24; 100.00
One
problem with the engraving of the Preuss drawing above is in
the peopleing. These details may have been added
later, or even by the engraver. Here the mountain howitzer
is depicted as a European howitzer, complete with
dolphins, or handles.
This had given rise to many theories about the
identification of the famous Lost Frémont
Howitzer.
But it is now known for certain that Frémont had a US
Mountain Howitzer built in 1837.
Read about the actual recovery of that howitzer from Deep
Creek, just east of the West Walker River (and right where
Frémont recorded that he had abandoned it).
Read
THE
CROSSING
to find out where Frémont's Howitzer was
left in 1844.
|